| From | Message |
baccarat online gambling crown
Guest
4/14/2005
07:43:03
|
 Subject: recomendation
IP: Logged
Message:
Hi All
The other day my best friend refered me to these amazing sites and sinve you are all my friends I though I would share them with you, so here they are:
<a title='' href='http://www.online-casinos-789.com' > online casinos </a> -> http://www.online-casinos-789.com
<a href='http://baptist-online-singles-beautiful.1oooo.com' > baptist online singles beautiful </a>-> http://baptist-online-singles-beautiful.1oooo.com
<a href='http://flash-online-poker-free.tvlok.com' > flash online poker free </a>-> http://flash-online-poker-free.tvlok.com
<a href='http://model-online-dating-fast.tvlok.com' > model online dating fast </a>-> http://model-online-dating-fast.tvlok.com
<a href='http://baccarat-online-gambling-crown.n7s.net' > baccarat online gambling crown </a>-> http://baccarat-online-gambling-crown.n7s.net
Enjoy All
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/03/2006
08:26:49
| RE: recomendation
IP: Logged
Message:
100 Years of E=mc2
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
1. What is E=mc2 ? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency?
The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation.
3. Is Einstein’s derivation of L =mc2 correct?
The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature.
4. What are contradictory results?
Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein’s 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science.
5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?
Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.
6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?
Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.
7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?
I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
8. How do you compare these two equations?
Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2.
9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?
In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.
10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?
Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.
11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community?
The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year.
12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?
Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK.
13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they don’t exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.
14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?
This book is being published soon.
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. Science today is not the same in 16th or 17th century. We should aim at 22nd or 23rd century scientific scenarios.
Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email mc2.book@gmail.com
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/03/2006
17:44:20
| RE: recomendation
IP: Logged
Message:
Do you even look at the links you spam?
Your answer has no correlation, it is just a shameless self-promotion of your junk paper.
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
9/14/2006
04:54:26
| RE: recomendation
IP: Logged
Message:
The persistent idiocy of Ajay Sharma.
Mass does not increase as a result of em radiation, mass only DECREASES, idiot!
You (FPRI=Ajay Sharma) say this cretinism in your paper right after equation (13) on page 201. Not only that you are a cretin, you also lie stupidly and you get caught.
|
FPRI
Guest
9/14/2006
06:08:21
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
Donk Inpain of CERN ( you say I am at CERN in various post )
Let ME KNOW HOW eq.(13) at page 201 is wrong.
This I wanted from you.
It is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW.
Donk there are references of scientific MERTI of Ajay Sharma.
References of Einstein’s work
.
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharma’s work
My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems (
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
FPRI
|
|
|
