| From | Message |
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/07/2006
16:03:43
|
 Subject: 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
FPRI writes:
"I know Ajay Sharma since years and his work so I am writing you."
My answer:
What do you mean, you ARE Ajay Sharma playing "sock-puppets"
<rest of Ajay Sharma lies and idiocies snipped>
|
fpri
Guest
9/07/2006
17:19:36
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
Donk In PAIN
I, AM FPRI, OK
We know each other very well.
IDIOT, TELL ME where is the fault in scientific work
a) page no
(b) line number
(c) equation
where you feel is incorrect in Ajay Sharma’s paper.
DONK you are beating about the bush . Not copmimg to point.
THERE IS NO FAULT IN THE PAPER.
DONK, the author/Editor/refrees are wiser then you.
I will reply.
DONK IN SO MANY POSTS DID YOU WTITE A SPECIFIC COMMENT.
FPRI
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
9/10/2006
10:44:58
| 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet". This is progress.
As to the errors, they have been explaned to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to accept them.
|
fpri
Guest
9/10/2006
11:11:24
| Shameless Inpain
IP: Logged
Message:
SHAMELESS give scientific explanation.
Donk
Give one example , I will just explain.
Whatever you wrote earlier implies
(i) You DONT KNOW CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM
(ii) you are zero about Einstein's Sep 1905 derivation.
Give scientific explanation , shameless.
Author/Editor/Referees are all correct. You try to understand.
FPRI
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/10/2006
17:17:34
| 100 years of Mc^2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet". This is progress.
As to the errors, they have been explaned to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to accept them.
|
FPRI
Guest
9/10/2006
17:33:25
| Shameless Donk
IP: Logged
Message:
SHAMELESS Donk
I may be any one you give scientific explantion.
The aim to discuss Einstein's limitation.
SHAMELESS give scientific explanation.
Give one example , I will just explain.
Whatever you wrote earlier implies
(i) You DONT KNOW CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM
(ii) you are zero about Einstein's Sep 1905 derivation.
Give scientific explanation , shameless.
Author/Editor/Referees are all correct. You try to understand.
FPRI
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/11/2006
10:04:19
| 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet". This is progress.
As to the errors, they have been explained to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to understand and to accept the rebuttals.
|
fpri
Guest
9/12/2006
05:04:57
| 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Give scientific explanation , shameless.
Author/Editor/Referees are all correct. You try to understand.
FPRI
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/12/2006
14:18:08
| 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
So now you call yourself "FPRI"? What does it stand for? Foolish Persistent Ridiculous Imbecile?
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet" for Ajay Sharma.
As to the errors, they have been explained to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to understand and to accept the rebuttals.
|
fpri
Guest
9/12/2006
15:46:48
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
Donk Inpain of CERN ( as you claim that you are at CERN )
Donk don’t abuse.
Don't write too much.
I want scientific logic.
I know you have lost before you started discussion.
Just give example, HOW AJAY SHARMA'S work is incorrect with logics.
AJAY SHARMA /EDITOR/ REFREES are all correct.
If not prove it.
FPRI
|
