| From | Message |
dr. Alexander Inpain
Guest
7/03/2006
02:36:27
|
 Subject: 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Mr. Ajay Sharma has written a self published book (i.e. he paid for its publication out of his own pocket) pompously entitled "100 Years of Mc2".
In it, mr. Sharma professes to have "completed" the "unfinished" work of one Albert Einstein.
Mr. Ajay Sharma claims that he has been invited to speak at multiple conferences: in reality he invited himself in the "poster" section, where papers are not refereed.
Mr. Sharma has also managed to get his paper into Physics Essays, a fringe journal despised by professionals.
In reality, as it was shown to Ajay Sharma over several hundreds of posts by multiple professional physicists on mutiple physics forums, his "masterpiece" is nothing but a rookie error. In a nutshell, Ajay Sharma believes that he has demonstrated "mass increase" as a result of a gedankexperiment. The mainstream physicists tried to explain (without success) that all he has demonstrated is a trivial variation of momentum.
Mr. Ajay Sharma tries to peddle his discovery on multiple forums, an unprecedented move in the profession and a very unprofessional act in iteself. This ethics misbehavior add to the fact that mr. Ajay Sharma's paper has been debunked as pure garbage by multiple people on the different forums.
A simple Google search for "physicsajay" will bring up many if not all the rebuttals agains the shoddy work of a pompous ass called Ajay Sharma. have fun!
|
nVid
Guest
7/04/2006
02:20:51
| RE: 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
I just did a simple Google search for "physicsajay" but it did not bring up any rebuttals? Perhapse you could give more specifics on why you disagree? We could all learn something that way. At a minimum, please explain:
1) why you think he demonstrated a variation of momentum
2) why it's trivial
3) why it's unprofessional to present ideas in a forum
4) how was his theory debunked
5) why you claim his work was shoddy
6) why you call him a pompous ass
7) what your area of expertise is
Again, I couldn't find answers to any of these questions by doing a Google search as you suggested, which honestly puts your credibility at issue.
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
7/04/2006
03:05:03
| 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
"I just did a simple Google search for "physicsajay" but it did not bring up any rebuttals? "
See the following:
http://killdevilhill.com/philosophyforums/search.php?searchid=2706
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blogs/commentdisplay.aspx?cid=51500
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1018646#post1018646
Need more?
http://www.scienceagogo.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?/topic/3/63.html
"that way. At a minimum, please explain:
1) why you think he demonstrated a variation of momentum"
There were litterally hundreds of explanations, give by me and and by other physicists. You can look up the links above.
See one of mine, from this website:
Ajay Sharma, read again:
In Einstein's paper the system remains at rest because he uses two cancelling waves.
In YOUR plagiarised extension, the system is not at rest because of the recoil due to YOUR idiotic use of a SINGLE wave. Since the system is not at rest, there is variation of momentum
2) why it's trivial
Because the system in cause recoils changing momentum . Ajay Sharma keeps claiming that the systems experience a "mass increase" thus refuting not only Einstein's work but also mainstream physics and daily experimental evidence.
3) why it's unprofessional to present ideas in a forum
Because real physicists DO NOT ADVERTISE THEIR IMPENDING PUBLICATIONS IN FORUMS. EVER.
By contrast , Ajay Sharma has advertised all over the internet, including kook antirelativistic forums!
4) how was his theory debunked
See the hundreds of posts, Ajay Sharma has been rebutted all over the place, his threads have been closed by moderators, etc.
5) why you claim his work was shoddy
Because it take a gross error (confusion of momentum change as mass increase) and it "spreads it over 28 pages of variations on the same theme.
6) why you call him a pompous ass
Look at the arrogant tone he assumes vs. Einstein's "unfinished" work in the opening of his paper. Look at the self -agrandizing presentations of Ajay Sharma, the man that "completed" Einstein's work.
7) what your area of expertise is
Nuclear physics. CERN. Good enough?
|
FPRI
Guest
9/03/2006
07:27:07
| RE: 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Ajay Sharma is correct.
His book is Royality based and accepted by publishers after expert opinion. It is being discussed globally.
The subject matter is discuused ininterantional conferences in USA, ENGALND etc. and published /being published in peer review journals.
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
Read the followings
(i) Basic physics definition of Conservation of Momentum.
For your help : It is conserved when body remains at REST or recoils after emission of light energy.
TAKE HELP FROM BASIC PHYSICS.
EINSTEIN HAS DONE SIMPLE CASE THAT BODY REMAINS AT REST.
(ii) Read Einstein's 29 sEP 1905 PAPER,UNDERSTAND AND MASTER IT.
tHEN TRY TO THINK ABOUT AJAY SHARMA'S WORK.
He is absoltely correct.
You did not undertsand for hours he spent on teaching you.
(a) Einstein derivation is applicable when body REMAINS AT REST OR MOVES. It is theoretically if velocity of body is Classical region.
(b) Einstein's derivation IS ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN VELOCITY IS IN CLASSICAL REGION, as in the derivation Binomial Theorem is userd and RELATIVISTIC VARATION MASS WITH VELOCITY IS NOT TAKEN IN ACCOUNT.
|
FPRI
Guest
9/03/2006
07:34:36
| RE: 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Ajay Sharma is correct.
His book is Royality based and accepted by publishers after expert opinion. It is being discussed globally.
The subject matter is discuused ininterantional conferences in USA, ENGALND etc. and published /being published in peer review journals.
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
Read the followings
(i) Basic physics definition of Conservation of Momentum.
For your help : It is conserved when body remains at REST or recoils after emission of light energy.
TAKE HELP FROM BASIC PHYSICS.
EINSTEIN HAS DONE SIMPLE CASE THAT BODY REMAINS AT REST.
(ii) Read Einstein's 29 sEP 1905 PAPER,UNDERSTAND AND MASTER IT.
tHEN TRY TO THINK ABOUT AJAY SHARMA'S WORK.
He is absoltely correct.
You did not undertsand for hours he spent on teaching you.
(a) Einstein derivation is applicable when body REMAINS AT REST OR MOVES. It is theoretically if velocity of body is Classical region.
(b) Einstein's derivation IS ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN VELOCITY IS IN CLASSICAL REGION, as in the derivation Binomial Theorem is userd and RELATIVISTIC VARATION MASS WITH VELOCITY IS NOT TAKEN IN ACCOUNT.
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/06/2006
03:25:02
| Ajay Sharma - crook
IP: Logged
Message:
FPRI, you ARE AJay Sharma.
And "both of you" are WRONG. Crook.
|
FPRI
Guest
9/06/2006
16:42:20
| RE: 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Ajay Sharma's work is in international journals and conferences.
It is true.
If you think itis wrong then contradict in JOURNALS.
Thus Ajay Sharma will be tied.
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/06/2006
23:56:10
| 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
FPRI aka Ajay Sharma writes:
"Ajay Sharma's work is in international journals and conferences.
It is true.
If you think itis wrong then contradict in JOURNALS.
Thus Ajay Sharma will be tied."
Yes, Ajay Sharma is fit to be tied, I agree with you.
|
fpri
Guest
9/07/2006
04:22:01
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
HA HA AHA
DONK
Dont disgrace CERN, if you canot grace it
Unmoderated internet druop DONK writer.
Ajay Sharma has published in international journals.
You are showing your folly defaming CERN since four monts.
WHY DONT YOU CONTRADICT AJAY SHARMA IN SCIENTIFC JOURNALS.
Donk , understanding is required for that.
If you have show it.
It is open challenge.
fpri
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/07/2006
07:16:32
| 100 years of Mc2, fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
FPRI, you are an obvious sock-puppet for Ajay Sharma.
Only cowards resort to such tactics. You published in a fringe journal which is worthless.
I exposed your errors on this website and you could only answer with insults. Meaning that you know by now that your so-called "paper" is pure garbage. And the rest of the internet knows it as well, courtesy to your boastful, self-advertising, error-filled posts.
|
fpri
Guest
9/07/2006
11:58:55
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
In pain Donk
I know Ajay Sharma since years and his work so I am writing you.
What is the problem, TRY TO UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING IS CONSISTENT.
Einstein’s derivation is true under certain conditions not always. This is theme of Ajay work
See in your posts you are never specific. Wiseman always come to point.
Point out specifically
(a) page no
(b) line number
(c) equation
where you feel is incorrect in Ajay Sharma’s paper.
If your objection is genuine we will admit here and close the discussion.
Before writing read the Einstein’s paper and Ajay Sharma paper.
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
My paper is available at
Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
fpri
|
