| From | Message |
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/06/2006
15:04:22
|
 Subject: Ajay Sharma, persistent idiot
IP: Logged
Message:
The issue is not me, it is you and your shitty paper. It is your insitence that you are "completing" Einstein's work. You are not, because what you wrote has been refuted as being patently wrong.
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/06/2006
15:15:24
| work DONT BARK
IP: Logged
Message:
MY WORK IS PUBLISHED NOT ONLY A SINGLE JOURNALS BUT OVER 12 (twelve) journals and international conferences.
It is scientific way.
IF YOU THINK it is wrong PROVE IT IN JOURNALS.
AJAY SHARMA
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
9/06/2006
23:57:32
| Ajay Sharma, persistent idiot
IP: Logged
Message:
So, you presented the same shit 11 times and you published it in a fringe journal. So what? It is still shit.
|
fpri
Guest
9/07/2006
04:20:21
| Ajay Sharma, persistent idiot
IP: Logged
Message:
HA HA AHA
DONK
Do not disgrace CERN, if you cannot grace it
Unmoderated internet druop DONK writer.
Ajay Sharma has published in international journals.
You are showing your folly defaming CERN since four monts.
WHY DONT YOU CONTRADICT AJAY SHARMA IN SCIENTIFC JOURNALS.
Donk , understanding is required for that.
If you have show it.
It is open challenge.
fpri
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
9/07/2006
07:16:59
| Ajay Sharma, persistent idiot
IP: Logged
Message:
FPRI, you are an obvious sock-puppet for Ajay Sharma.
Only cowards resort to such tactics. You published in a fringe journal which is worthless.
I exposed your errors on this website and you could only answer with insults. Meaning that you know by now that your so-called "paper" is pure garbage. And the rest of the internet knows it as well, courtesy to your boastful, self-advertising, error-filled posts.
|
fpri
Guest
9/07/2006
11:57:57
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
In pain
I know Ajay Sharma since years and his work so I am writing you.
What is the problem, TRY TO UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING IS CONSISTENT.
Einstein’s derivation is true under certain conditions not always. This is theme of Ajay work
See in your posts you are never specific. Wiseman always come to point.
Point out specifically
(a) page no
(b) line number
(c) equation
where you feel is incorrect in Ajay Sharma’s paper.
If your objection is genuine we will admit here and close the discussion.
Before writing read the Einstein’s paper and Ajay Sharma paper.
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
be specific and we will resolve it finally.
fpri
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/07/2006
16:04:30
| Ajay Sharma, persistent idiot and fraud
IP: Logged
Message:
FPRI writes:
"I know Ajay Sharma since years and his work so I am writing you."
My answer:
What do you mean, you ARE Ajay Sharma playing "sock-puppets". Who do you think you are fooling?
<rest of Ajay Sharma lies and idiocies snipped>
|
fpri
Guest
9/07/2006
17:18:48
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
Donk In PAIN
I, AM FPRI, OK
We know each other very well.
IDIOT, TELL ME where is the fault in scientific work
a) page no
(b) line number
(c) equation
where you feel is incorrect in Ajay Sharma’s paper.
DONK you are beating about the bush . Not copmimg to point.
THERE IS NO FAULT IN THE PAPER.
DONK, the author/Editor/refrees are wiser then you.
I will reply.
DONK IN SO MANY POSTS DID YOU WTITE A SPECIFIC COMMENT.
FPRI
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/10/2006
10:45:31
| Ajay Sharma, persistent idiot
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet". This is progress.
As to the errors, they have been explaned to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to accept them.
|
fpri
Guest
9/10/2006
11:10:24
| Shameless Inpain
IP: Logged
Message:
SHAMELESS give scientific explanation.
Give one example , I will just explain.
Whatever you wrote earlier implies
(i) You DONT KNOW CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM
(ii) you are zero about Einstein's Sep 1905 derivation.
Give scientific explanation , shameless.
Author/Editor/Referees are all correct. You try to understand.
FPRI
|
