| From | Message |
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/03/2006
08:28:41
|
 Subject: 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
100 Years of E=mc2
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
1. What is E=mc2 ? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency?
The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation.
3. Is Einstein’s derivation of L =mc2 correct?
The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature.
4. What are contradictory results?
Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein’s 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science.
5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?
Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.
6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?
Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.
7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?
I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
8. How do you compare these two equations?
Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2.
9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?
In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.
10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?
Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.
11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community?
The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year.
12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?
Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK.
13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they don’t exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.
14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?
This book is being published soon.
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. Science today is not the same in 16th or 17th century. We should aim at 22nd or 23rd century scientific scenarios.
Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email mc2.book@gmail.com
Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/03/2006
17:43:41
| Ajay Sharma-self promoter
IP: Logged
Message:
Hi,
You are back with more of the same junk you have been pushing. You still don't get the momentum conservation.
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/05/2006
04:24:43
| RE: 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything is consistent in paper. Remember Einstein derived L=mc2 under classical conditions it speculated applications are used under many conditions but taking in account its original derivation.
Part I
The law of momentum conservation,
* In an isolated system, the momentum of system must be conserved.*
Mathematically implies that
Initial Momentum = Final Momentum
mu=mv (1)
As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
So u=v
which is Newton’s First law of motion.
Application of momentum conservation.
When body emits energy ( in this cases light energy)
then it recoils .Thus it is used to calculate the velocity of recoil.
It can be applied to following two cases.
------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
( body does not recoil with noticeable velocity, it tends to recoil)
The velocity cam be calculated but may be of the order of
1/100000000000000000000000000000000000 m/s or 10-^40m/s
This case resembles with Einstein’s two waves of equal energy emitted in opposite directions.
-----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
the velocity can be calculated from conservation of momentum i.e.
initial momentum =final momentum
Vrecoil = mv/M ~ 5m/s (say)
Thus after emission of energy BODY MAY REMAIN AT REST OR MOVE, the momentum is conserved. It is basic physics of 11th standard.
If some one does not want to understand this then it his problem.
Part II
The role of momentum conservation in equation of inter conversion of mass-energy.
Einstein did not mention word about it, in the Sep 1905 paper, which gives
…….. Inter conversion of mass to energy i.e. energy is converted to mass or mass to energy..
This law is only valid to calculate the velocity of recoil and relative velocity must remain in classic region.
You can understand Einstein’s 29 Sep 1905 paper, it is true under classical conditions.
This is only the role of momentum conservation nothing ELSE.
You can check, every word of Einstein’s paper.
Part III
Reason of emission of Light Energy in Einstein’s paper.
It is due to annihilation of mass of body. Thus mass decreases and energy is emitted.
You can check the equations.
Final Mass = Initial mass –L/c2.
It is derived on the basis of ENERGY CONSIDERATION in two frames of reference. The momentum does not come in picture, if velocity of recoil and relative velocity is in classical region.
If due to recoil or due to motion of moving system VELOCITY IS IN RELATIVITIC REGION THEN EINSTEIN’S SEP 1905 DERIVATION IS INVALID. AS THIS CASE RELATIVISTIC INCREASE IN MASS HAS TO BE TAKEN IN ACCOUNT.
Part IV
Increase in mass when body emits Light Energy.
See that it follows from Einstein’s same derivation which gives WHEN LIGHT ENERGY EMITTED MASS DECREASES,
The law of conservation of momentum is true when body remains at rest or moves. Einstein simply took the simplest case when BODY IS AT REST. Like this Einstein too took the simplest or handpicked values of parameters to draw the results.
If Einstein’s hand picked variable is not considered, i.e. more than two waves with slightly different energies are considered (0.501 L and 0.499L) IN EXACTLY OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS, then Einstein’s derivation predicts that WHEN BODY EMITS LIGHT ENERGY ITS MASS MUST INCREASE.
It follows mathematically under valid operations.
So Einstein’s derivation of L =mc2 is true under certain conditions only.
Part V
The main equation in Einstein derivation is that relativistic variation of mass which was given by Einstein in June 1905 paper e.g.
l* = l (1-v/ccos phi)/ (1-v2/c2)1/2
Validity of Einstein Sep. 1905 derivation:
Einstein has considered the simplest conditions for derived L =mc2. Conceptually it is valid in many cases.
(i) Body may move after emission of Light energy PROVIDED that relative velocity remains in classical region.
(ii) Body may be emit one wave, 2 waves or n number of waves. Energy is emitted and converted into mass.
(iii) Energy of each wave emitted may be equal or unequal.
(iv) Angles of the waves may be exactly opposite or not
THE OVER ALL CONDITION IS THAT RELATIVE VELOCITY MUST BE IN CLASSICAL REGIONS, otherwise relativistic effect will be taken in account which makes derivation invalid.
AJAY SHARMA
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/05/2006
05:01:11
| 400 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
Yes, Einstein is correct and complete while your "paper" has rookie mistakes.
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/05/2006
10:50:06
| RE: 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
you have objected momeNtum is not conseve din my paper.
In ParI I have proved it conserved.
your objection is removed.
More over your work is published in international journals and conferences after approval of experts.
AJAY SHARMA
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/05/2006
18:08:50
| 400 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
You proved that you don't understand basic physics.
This is why you try spamming the whole internet trying to attract attention to your shitty work.
A piece of advice: real scientists do not need this desperate tactics of attracting attention. All you have "attracted" is rebuttals,
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/05/2006
18:19:56
| RE: 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
A piece of advice to real sceintist .
(i) He knows the scientific consensus comes form international journals and conferences.
(ii) If a real scientist find some objections then he goes to these places.
(iii) I found that Einstein Sep 1905 paper is true under special conditions. So I got it published in international journals and conferences.
(vi)Well if you find my work is objectionable, then as I HAVE CHAlLNED YOU YOU GO TO JOURANS AND GET THE your ideas published.
Editor Physics Essays is open minded over it.
Ajay Sharma
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/05/2006
18:56:59
| 400 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
You managed to publish some garbage, so what? It happens all the time.
There is no mass increase as described in your paper. And your equations are wron. And you make yourself the laughing stock of the whole internet (you are already the laughing stock at CERN where your posts are on the bulletin boards in the "Moron of the Day" section).
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/06/2006
02:53:47
| RE: 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
MY WORK IS PUBLISHED NOT ONLY A SINGLE JOURNALS BUT OVER 12 (twelve) journals and international conferences. Mind it.
A piece of advice to real sceintist .
(i) He knows the scientific consensus comes form international journals and conferences.
(ii) If a real scientist find some objections then he goes to these places.
(iii) I found that Einstein Sep 1905 paper is true under special conditions. So I got it published in international journals and conferences.
(vi)Well if you find my work is objectionable, then as I HAVE CHAlLNED YOU YOU GO TO JOURANS AND GET THE your ideas published.
Editor Physics Essays is open minded over it.
Ajay Sharma
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/06/2006
03:15:53
| RE: 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
Your shit is published in Physics Essays.
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/06/2006
12:51:25
| RE: 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
HAVE YOU EVER PUBLISHED A LINE WITH BASIC LAWS.
(i)MY WORK IS PUBLISHED NOT ONLY A SINGLE JOURNALS BUT OVER 12 (twelve) journals and international conferences.
Well, if you dont like it you are not forced to like it.
(ii) vi)Well if you find my work is objectionable, then as I HAVE CHAlLNED YOU YOU GO TO JOurnals AND GET THE your ideas published.
Editor Physics Essays is open minded over it.
AJAY SHARMA
|
