| From | Message |
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/10/2006
11:14:27
|
 Subject: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members
IP: Logged
Message:
Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma
Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper, which gives derivation of E=mc2 critically analyzed. It is confirmed that derivation of E=mc2 is true under special conditions only. Thus it is extended to dE=Ac2dm This work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW and also presented in international conferences in USA and ENGLAND.
Part I
Unfortunately some members made hurried comments on the work without even reading what Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper. When I replied, then the reply is not attended. Moreover while raising objections, the members did not disclose their identities, so that to understand the level of their knowledge in the subject. It Is not fair in any way. One should try to go to the roots of the truth. The main misunderstandings were regarding applications of scope of law of conservation of linear momentum and inadequate knowledge of Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation.
Also E=mc2 is confirmed in nuclear reactions, then it does not mean it is also true in all cases universally. However there are some experimental inconsistencies in nuclear physics as well. For example it is not confirmed in Chemical Reactions, due to technical reasons. There are bizarre reactions involving, creation of universe (WHAT WAS BEFORE BIG BANG) and astrophysics etc.
Part II
Einstein considered a body emitting light energy, and this energy was measured by moving observer. Einstein derived L=mc2 under very conditions e.g when body emits two light waves , of equal energy emitted in opposite direction.
LIGHT ENERGY IS EMITTED MASS OF BODY DECREASES
Thus Einstein’s derived L=mc2 i.e. light energy mass equation and speculated from here E=mc2. The central equation in this regard is relativistic light energy equation
l* = l{1 – v/c cos φ } /√[1 – v2 /c2] (1)
The link to Einstein’s paper is
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
However Einstein’s derivation is conceptually valid when body emits n number of waves, having any magnitude of energy, emitted at any directions. Under some conditions (which are considered by Einstein) , Einstein’s 29 Sep 105 derivation also predicts
LIGHT ENERGY IS EMITTED MASS OF BODY must INCREASE (increase)
Light energy is emitted mass of body must increase (INCREASE)
Part III
Thus Ajay Sharma put forth
Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation of L=mc2 ( from which he speculated E=mc2) is true under special conditions only , not in GENERAL .
The reason is that some results from Einstein’s derivation are not consistent
It is not justified at all, but follows from Einstein’s derivation.
Thus mass energy inter conversion equation has been
Thus mass energy equation is derived in an alternate ways
dE=Ac2dm
where is coefficient of proportionality like many others existing physics. Like all other coefficients of proportionality its value depends upon experimental conditions. Thus energy emitted by generalized equation dE=Ac2dm can be less , equal or more than Emc2.
Ajay Sharma‘s main work is available at
Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For further elaborated discussion link is
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
Part VI
It would be nice to have healthy discussion on the issue based upon scientific logics and facts for which requirement is knowledge of Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper and my work. If one discloses his identity then it will become easier for everyone. The science is refined only after arguments and discussions.
AJAY SHARMA Sep 10, 2006
Email physicsajay@yahoo.com
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/10/2006
17:18:30
| Perpetrated fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet". This is progress.
As to the errors, they have been explaned to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to accept them.
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/10/2006
17:43:24
| RE: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members
IP: Logged
Message:
Do know counting ?
Can you give one error?
Come to scientific terms everything will be over.
Moreover this work is global thus I am getting enough feedback.
Whatever baseles objections you raised , have been explained.
AJAY SHARMA
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/11/2006
10:02:18
| Ajay Sharma, crook
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet". This is progress.
As to the errors, they have been explained to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to understand and to accept the rebuttals.
|
fpri
Guest
9/12/2006
06:40:54
| RE: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members
IP: Logged
Message:
SHAMELESS give scientific explanation.
Give one example , I will just explain.
Whatever you wrote earlier implies
(i) You DONT KNOW CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM
(ii) you are zero about Einstein's Sep 1905 derivation.
Give scientific explanation , shameless.
Author/Editor/Referees are all correct. You try to understand.
FPRI
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
9/12/2006
14:15:59
| Ajay Sharma cheating imbecile
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet" for Ajay Sharma.
As to the errors, they have been explained to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to understand and to accept the rebuttals.
|
fpri
Guest
9/12/2006
15:49:41
| 100 Years of E=mc2
IP: Logged
Message:
Donk Inpain of CERN ( as you claim that you are at CERN )
Donk don’t abuse.
Don't write too much.
I want scientific logic.
I know you have lost before you started discussion.
Just give example, HOW AJAY SHARMA'S work is incorrect with logics.
AJAY SHARMA /EDITOR/ REFREES are all correct.
If not prove it.
FPRI
|
AJAY SHARMA
Guest
9/13/2006
07:22:38
| RE: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members
IP: Logged
Message:
Inpain
( You are at CERN , according to your posts, a very prestigious institutions).
I am still waiting for your scientific reply to conclude the dicussion.
I have following references for help.
References of Einstein’s work
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .
Weblink is
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharma’s work
My work is available at
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems (
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
I will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
AJAY SHARMA
|
dr. Inpain
Guest
9/14/2006
04:37:41
| RE: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of mem
IP: Logged
Message:
So now you call yourself "FPRI"? What does it stand for? Foolish Persistent Ridiculous Imbecile?
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet" for Ajay Sharma.
As to the errors, they have been explained to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to understand and to accept the rebuttals.
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
9/14/2006
04:49:06
| RE: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members
IP: Logged
Message:
The persistent idiocy of Ajay Sharma.
Mass does not increase as a result of em radiation, mass only DECREASES, idiot!
You (FPRI=Ajay Sharma) say this cretinism in your paper right after equation (13) on page 201. Not only that you are a cretin, you also lie stupidly and you get caught.
|
dr.Inpain
Guest
9/14/2006
06:17:48
| Persistent fraud by Ajay Sharma
IP: Logged
Message:
Good, so you admit that you are a "sock puppet" for Ajay Sharma.
As to the errors, they have been explained to you , hundreds of times. You are too imbecile to understand and to accept the rebuttals.
|
